Archives: Reinsurance

Subscribe to Reinsurance RSS Feed

Liquidator Compelled to Arbitrate Hurricane Reinsurance Disputes

The federal policy favoring arbitration sometimes bumps up against state-based receivers where the receiver would rather the receivership court address reinsurance disputes than have the matter arbitrated.  In the aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, which devastated Puerto Rico, reinsurance disputes arose over a cedent’s allocation between the hurricanes and other aspects of the many … Continue Reading

Post-Trial Motions Denied in Hard-Fought Reinsurance Dispute

Reinsurance disputes are rarely tried to a jury.  They are typically arbitrated.  When they are tried to a jury–just like any jury trial–there are often post-trial motions made to seek to overturn the jury verdict or modify the judgment.  Motions like that are difficult to win, especially when key facts are left to the jury to … Continue Reading

December 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter

In our December 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter we discuss non-signatories being bound by arbitration clauses, a case involving who decides arbitrability questions, a functus officio case, a remand to an arbitration panel to clarify an arbitration award, and an update on TRIA.  A number of other case developments are digested as well.  Please enjoy.  Feedback is always welcomed.… Continue Reading

Another Federal Court Denies Application to Seal Arbitration Award

Nearly every US reinsurance arbitration includes a Confidentiality Agreement.  The vast majority of those confidentiality agreements are based on the ARIAS•U.S. Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order model form.  Most confidentiality agreements provide that disclosure may be made “as is necessary in connection with court proceedings relating to any aspect of the arbitration, including but not limited … Continue Reading

Unique Arbitration Clause Does Not Prevent Granting of Motion to Compel Arbitration

Whether a motion to compel arbitration will be granted depends on, among other things, whether the arbitration provision is broad or narrow and whether the dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration provision.  In a recent case, a California federal court construed unique language in an arbitration provision in a reinsurance agreement, granted the … Continue Reading

Reinsurance and the Death Master File

In a traditional life insurance and reinsurance relationship, a life insurance company issues a policy to a policyholder and reinsures the policy (usually via a block of business consisting of the same or similar policies) with its reinsurer either by coinsurance or on a yearly renewable term basis (or otherwise).  When the insured person dies, … Continue Reading

It’s Not Over Until It Is Over

In reinsurance arbitrations, once the arbitration panel issues its final award its job is over.  That’s what the doctrine of functus officio means.  But there are exceptions to the functus officio rule (see our Blog from November 2018).  Additionally, what happens when a panel retains jurisdiction after issuing the final award?  In a recent case, … Continue Reading

Is Reinsurance Information Relevant In an Insurance Coverage Case?

There are lots of cases discussing the production of reinsurance contracts and reinsurance communications in insurance coverage disputes.  Generally, the answer depends on the specific facts of the case.  Recently, in a coverage case based on headline events, a New York motion court upheld a referee’s order for production of both reinsurance contracts and reinsurance … Continue Reading

Non-Party Notice of Appeal in Reinsurance Dispute Results in an Award of Attorney Fees

When you are not a party to a legal proceeding, but nevertheless file a notice of appeal purportedly on behalf of a party after a settlement, the likelihood of a positive outcome is very low.  Such was the case recently before a New York federal court.  The result:  an award of attorney fees.… Continue Reading

Where There Is No Intent There Is No Tortious Interference

Reinsurance programs are often complex and the calculation of reinsurance premiums can be confusing.  Periodically, a reinsured will review its reinsurance premium transactions to make sure that it has not been overpaying for its reinsurance protection.  Where a third-party premium audit company is used for that review, compensation is usually based upon a percentage of … Continue Reading

September 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter

The September 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter is now available for your reading pleasure.  You may access it on the Squire Patton Boggs website or here.  In this issue, we discuss a decision concerning the preclusive effect of an interim security award, a captive reinsurance dispute and an update on EU Third Country Equivalence.  Please enjoy.  Comments … Continue Reading

Without the Bellefonte Presumption, Reinsurer Denied Partial Summary Judgment

You remember Bellefonte, right?  Bellefonte Reinsurance. Co. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 903 F.2d 910 (1990).  When the New York Court of Appeals in Global Reinsurance Corp. of Am. v. Century Indemn. Co., 30, N.Y.3d 508 (2017), took the wind out of reliance on Bellefonte as authority for the stated limits in a facultative … Continue Reading

Pre-Answer Security and Preclusion Based on Arbitral Decision — Who Decides?

In reinsurance disputes where one party is insolvent or has financial difficulties, the other side often demands security.  Where a non-domiciliary is involved, some states have pre-answer security requirements, which have been held to apply in reinsurance arbitrations.  In a procedurally complicated case, where an arbitration panel issued a security award and then stayed the … Continue Reading

How Courts Select Umpires Where The Reinsurance Contract Gives Courts the Power

Some reinsurance contracts have a provision in the arbitration clause that allow the parties to ask a court to appoint the umpire if the parties cannot agree on the selection of one.  A court’s analysis of the candidates and whether they are qualified or should be disqualified from consideration as an umpire is always interesting … Continue Reading

The Consolidation Circus Continues

In December 2018, we blogged about a new reinsurance arbitration consolidation case.  We mentioned that the reinsurer filed several other petitions to compel arbitration in various jurisdictions all seeking to allow for consolidation of these disputes in three arbitrations  based on the different reinsurance programs.  The facts are the same so read the December 2018 post … Continue Reading

Liquidator’s Motion to Dismiss Petition to Confirm Reinsurance Arbitration Award Denied

In some states receivers may bring claims inside or outside the receivership court, including reinsurance arbitrations. In other states receivership proceedings end the ability of either party to bring a reinsurance arbitration outside of the liquidation court.  In a recent case, a receiver of an insolvent cedent commenced a reinsurance arbitration outside of the receivership … Continue Reading

Private Interest Outweighs Public Interest In Sealing of Arbitration Documents

In the past several years, motions to seal arbitration documents generally have been denied in favor of the public’s right to have access to documents filed in court.  We discussed this in a prior blog post in the context of arbitration awards.  But not every court will deny a motion to seal arising from a reinsurance … Continue Reading

March 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter

Our March 2019 Reinsurance Newsletter is available for your reading pleasure.  It covers reinsurance developments since December 2018 and also includes regulatory and policy updates as well as our annual Brief Review of Reinsurance Trends.  Please enjoy.  You can access the Newsletter here.… Continue Reading

Enforcement of Arbitration Subpoenas and Summonses

Sometimes it is necessary to obtain evidence from non-parties during a reinsurance arbitration.  Yet, the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not expressly sanction non-party (or for that matter any) pre-hearing discovery.  In practice, however, most parties ask the arbitration panel to issue a subpoena to a “hearing” and then negotiate with the non-party about producing … Continue Reading

When Arbitrators Exceed Their Powers

When an arbitration panel issues a final award any challenge to that award faces an uphill battle.  That is because under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) a final arbitration award must be confirmed (if requested) and can only be vacated for a very narrow set of reasons.  Of the four grounds for vacatur under Section … Continue Reading

Some Thoughts on Proving an Insurance Contract in Court

Insurance companies often have their backs against the wall in any dispute.  Typically, in a coverage or premium action brought by the insurance company, it bears the burden of proving its insurance contract and any exclusionary endorsements.  In inter-company disputes that may be a bit easier and the rules may be a bit looser (e.g., … Continue Reading

Arbitration Awards and Confidentiality Revisited

In reinsurance arbitrations, most parties agree to confidentiality and enter into a formal confidentiality order.  The confidentiality order typically applies to the final award as well as all materials generated in the arbitration.  Some insurance and reinsurance agreements have confidentiality provisions that lead to the same result.  The ARIAS-U.S. Rules for U.S. Insurance & Reinsurance … Continue Reading
LexBlog