Archives: Duty to Defend

Subscribe to Duty to Defend RSS Feed

New York Court of Appeals Holds Non-domiciliary RRG Not Covered Under New York Late Disclaimer Rules

The federal Liability Risk Retention Act allows for the creation of industry groups–Risk Retention Groups (“RRG”) or Purchasing Groups–that are exempt from certain state insurance regulation requirements outside the RRG’s state of charter.  Most states, if not all, have unfair claims practices acts and those statutes are expressly applicable to RRGs.  Many states also have statutes … Continue Reading

Untimely Notice Causes Loss of Directors and Officers Coverage

Claims-made and reported policies typically contain, as a condition precedent, fairly strict notice requirements.  The entire point of a claims-made policy is to restrict the policy to claims made during the policy period and reported during the policy period or any extended reporting period.  Giving notice early and often is a mantra that is often … Continue Reading

When Seeking Coverage for Trademark Infringement Policy Exclusions Matter

In a recent case, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a coverage dispute based on unambiguous exclusions barring coverage.  Nothing dramatically unique here, but it serves as a good example of the need to read and understand the insurance policy and all of its exclusions.  … Continue Reading

Invasion of Privacy Exclusion Bars Coverage for TCPA Action and Settlement

Where an insurance policy has an express exclusion for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) claims it is pretty clear that coverage will not be available.  But where the insurance policy does not have an express TCPA exclusion, does an Invasion of Privacy Exclusion bar coverage for alleged TCPA violations?  A Florida federal court recently found … Continue Reading

Breach of Cooperation Clause Shields Carrier From Duty to Indemnify

The cooperation clause in an insurance policy is an essential part of the insurance bargain.  If the policyholder does not cooperate in the reporting or investigation of a claim, the coverage the policyholder paid for may be lost.  In a recent case, a policyholder whose employees lied to investigators was found to have breached the … Continue Reading

No Coverage When Claims Relate Back to Notices Prior to Policy Inception

It is pretty common for D&O and E&O and other professional liability claims-made policies to have exclusions that preclude coverage for incidents that took place and were noticed prior to the inception of the policy.  Unless the policyholder has purchased “nose” coverage or has a retroactive date that goes back far enough, a prior noticed … Continue Reading

Late-Notice Defense for Insurance Coverage Is Still a Thing

Notice provisions in insurance policies are there to inform an insurer of a claim in a timely manner so that the insurance company can properly investigate and address the claim.  Most notice provisions are conditions precedent to an insurer’s liability. While there has been some erosion to the defense of late-notice to coverage, a recent … Continue Reading

When Is a Claim for Rescission Ripe for Adjudication?

Once in a while an insurance company learns that its insured did not accurately portray its risk when applying for the insurance policy.  In many cases, the insurance company will just cancel the policy, but sometimes the insurance company will want to rescind the policy so that no claims can be filed for the period … Continue Reading

No Coverage for a Claim of Impairment of Goodwill and Reputation Under Defamation Endorsement

When a business gets sued it looks to its various insurance policies for coverage and a defense.  But sometimes the insurance policy purchased does not fit the coverage sought.  That was the case in the Seventh Circuit where a restaurant company sought coverage for a claim brought by a television provider for damages when the … Continue Reading

Advertising Injury and Offering For Sale

Whether an activity is advertising such that it comes within the advertising injury coverage grant of a commercial general liability (CGL) policy is a difficult and complicated question.  Maybe it shouldn’t be, but the coverage grant combined with exclusions to avoid coverage for intellectual property infringement claims and coverage write-backs within exclusions makes it complicated. … Continue Reading

Coverage for Government Investigations and Warranty of No Known Claims

Obtaining insurance coverage for a government investigation is often complicated by the type of investigation and the available coverage.  Most policies that cover aspects of government investigations–directors and officers liability policies or errors and omissions policies–are written on a claims-made form and exclude claims that relate back to prior or pending claims.  Very often the … Continue Reading

What Happens When a Policyholder Settles Without Involving Its Insurer?

Nobody likes to get sued.  When a lawsuit or a demand letter comes in, the first thing that crosses the mind of the party being sued (or claimed against) is how can I resolve this quickly?  That may be a reasonable visceral reaction to the suit, but what happens when insurance is involved?… Continue Reading

Is a Failure to Disclaim Coverage an Unfair Claim Settlement Practice for a Risk Retention Group?

The application of New York Insurance Law § 3420(d)(2), which requires notice of disclaimer as soon as reasonably possible under a liability policy, has resulted in quite a few cases testing its outer limits and proper implementation.  In a recent case, a New York intermediate appellate court was asked to address § 3420(d)(2)’s application in the … Continue Reading

New York Court of Appeals Looks to Policy Language Again to Allocate Risk Proportionately to Insurers

On March 27, 2018, New York’s highest court finally brought closure to an appeal of a 2014 decision denying an insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment in its coverage litigation with its policyholder.  The Court of Appeals’ decision in Keyspan Gas East Corp. v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. is available here.  In affirming the Appellate … Continue Reading

Errors and Omissions and Directors and Officers Clash Gets Some Clarity From the Second Circuit

Most companies that provide specialized or professional services, like stock exchanges, carry both directors and officers liability insurance (“D&O”) and errors and omissions insurance (“E&O”). These coverages are meant to be complimentary and not overlapping.  D&O covers “wrongful acts” by directors and officers.  E&O covers negligent acts in performing professional services.  D&O policies typically exclude … Continue Reading

Lack of Inclusion Means Timely Notice of Disclaimer Is Not Required

Typically, courts are strict when it comes to insurance companies disclaiming coverage.  Generally, a disclaimer must be specific and timely for it to have any chance of being effective.  In many cases, an insurance policy has an exclusion that the insurance company contends precludes coverage.  In other cases, the coverage alleged is just not provided … Continue Reading

Why Suing Every Insurance Company in Sight Does Not Always Work

There is a common misconception that suing everyone in sight is a good idea.  Yes, if you don’t know exactly what related companies (or individuals) ultimately may be responsible for the loss it may make sense to cast a wider net (especially if the limitations period is approaching).  But if it is obvious who the … Continue Reading

Failure to Comply With Protective Safeguards Endorsement Results in Loss of Coverage

A Protective Safeguards Endorsement (“PSE”), as defined by my friends at IRMI, is “[a] property insurance endorsement that makes it a condition of coverage that the protective safeguards cited in the endorsement (such as an automatic sprinkler system or night watch guard) be in operation at all times except when the insurer has been notified of … Continue Reading

The Peril of Settling Without Insurer Consent

In an earlier blog post we discussed a Georgia case where settlement occurred without consent from the insured.  In that case, the court held that when a policyholder settles without consent in the face of a consent to settle clause, the policyholder will not succeed in seeking a recovery for that settlement from the insurance … Continue Reading

When Notice of Claim Is a Condition Precedent a Default Judgment May Not Help

Notice of claim or suit requirements in insurance policies are often viewed as a condition precedent to coverage.  If the insured’s carrier is not given notice of the claim in a timely manner, the insurer may have no obligation to defend or indemnify the insured.  But what happens if a claimant sues an insured defendant … Continue Reading

New York’s 3420(d)(2) Cannot Be Used Between Insurers

We have written a number of blog posts involving New York Insurance Law Section 3420(d)(2), which requires insurance companies to disclaim quickly or waive the right to disclaim.  Parties have tried to rely on 3420(d)(2) in a variety of ways.  In a recent case, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was asked to address the … Continue Reading

Privity and Additional Insured Coverage

When a worker is injured on a construction job and sues the relevant parties, a side battle often ensues over which carrier has the duty to defend and indemnify the owner, general contractor or subcontractor based on the language in the various construction contracts requiring some or all of those parties to be named as … Continue Reading
LexBlog