Archives: Treaty

Subscribe to Treaty RSS Feed

September 2017 Reinsurance Newsletter

Our September 2017 Reinsurance Newsletter includes a featured article on discovery of reserves and reinsurance information as well as an update on the US-EU Covered Agreement.  It also reports on recent cases, including a manifest disregard case, a case on Insurance Law 1213 security and reinsurance collection issues by the assignee of a liquidator.  Please … Continue Reading

June 2017 Reinsurance Newsletter

This quarter’s Squire Patton Boggs Reinsurance Newsletter leads off with a summary of a New York federal case where an arbitration award was vacated for evident partiality.  It also features an update on the US-EU Covered Agreement. Please enjoy.… Continue Reading

Relationship? What Relationship?: Evident Partiality and Arbitrator Disclosure

Arbitrators have a special responsibility to disclose all relevant relationships to the parties so that any potential conflicts can be vetted. There are some obvious relationships that need to be disclosed like prior employment by one of the parties. There are other relationships that may be disclosed out of an abundance of caution, but typically … Continue Reading

Exculpatory Clauses in Reinsurance Agreements

Exculpatory clauses appear in many contracts. They are often used to protect a contracting party from damages caused by its actions or the actions of others. For example, a hold harmless clause may protect one party from third-party suits caused by the alleged negligence of the other party. Exculpatory clauses, like hold harmless or indemnification clauses, … Continue Reading

What a Difference a Word Makes

Lack of precision in reinsurance contract wording has been known to engender anomalous results. Often a single word or phrase can cause a court or arbitrator to construe an agreement in ways unintended. In reinsurance arbitrations, when the panel majority decides how a contract operates based on its construction of a word or phrase, the … Continue Reading

Contractual Privity and Reinsurance

In most jurisdictions a policyholder cannot bring a direct action against a reinsurer because of the lack of contractual privity. Yes, there are some quirky statutes and jurisdictions that allow a direct right of action under certain circumstances, but the general rule is that where there is no contractual relationship between the reinsurer and the … Continue Reading

7th Circuit Affirms Waiver of Removal Because of Reinsurance Agreement Service-of-Suit Clause

In December 2015, an Illinois federal court held that the language of a service-of-suit clause in a reinsurance contract was a voluntary removal waiver and sent a case removed to federal court back to state court. That case went up to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for review. The Seventh Circuit has now affirmed.… Continue Reading
LexBlog